Spectrins are membrane cytoskeletal proteins generally thought to function as heterotetramers comprising two α-spectrins and two β-spectrins. They influence cell shape and Hippo signaling, but the mechanism by which they influence Hippo signaling has remained unclear. We have investigated the role and regulation of the Drosophila β-heavy spectrin (β_H-spectrin, encoded by the karst gene) in wing imaginal discs. Our results establish that β_H-spectrin regulates Hippo signaling through the Jub biomechanical pathway due to its influence on cytoskeletal tension. While we find that α-spectrin also regulates Hippo signaling through Jub, unexpectedly, we find that β_H-spectrin localizes and functions independently of α-spectrin. Instead, β_H-spectrin co-localizes with and reciprocally regulates and is regulated by myosin. In vivo and in vitro experiments support a model in which β_H-spectrin and myosin directly compete for binding to apical F-actin. This competition can explain the influence of β_H-spectrin on cytoskeletal tension and myosin accumulation. It also provides new insight into how β_H-spectrin participates in ratcheting mechanisms associated with cell shape change.

Each of the three mammalian Ajuba family proteins, AJUBA, LIMD1 and WTIP, exhibit tension-dependent localization to adherens junctions, and can associate with Lats kinases. However, only LIMD1 has been directly demonstrated to directly regulate Lats activity in vivo. To assess the relationship of LIMD1 to AJUBA and WTIP, and the potential contributions of AJUBA and WTIP to Lats regulation, we examined the consequences of over-expressing AJUBA and WTIP in MCF10A cells. Over-expression of either AJUBA or WTIP reduced junctional localization of LIMD1, implying that these proteins can compete for binding to adherens junctions. This over-expression also reduced junctional localization of LATS1, implying that AJUBA or WTIP are unable to efficiently recruit Lats kinases to adherens junctions. This over-expression was also associated with increased YAP1 phosphorylation and decreased YAP1 nuclear localization, consistent with increased Lats kinase activity. These observations indicate that AJUBA and WTIP compete with LIMD1 for association with adherens junctions but have activities distinct from LIMD1 in Hippo pathway regulation. They further suggest that the ability of Ajuba family proteins to associate with Lats kinases in solution is not sufficient to enable regulation in vivo, and that tumor suppressor activities of AJUBA and WTIP could stem in part from competition with LIMD1 for regulation of Lats kinases at cell junctions.

The Ajuba LIM protein Jub mediates regulation of Hippo signaling by cytoskeletal tension through interaction with the kinase Warts and participates in feedback regulation of junctional tension through regulation of the cytohesin Steppke. To investigate how Jub interacts with and regulates its distinct partners, we investigated the ability of Jub proteins missing different combinations of its three LIM domains to rescue jub phenotypes and to interact with α-catenin, Warts and Steppke. Multiple regions of Jub contribute to its ability to bind α-catenin and to localize to adherens junctions in Drosophila wing imaginal discs. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments in cultured cells identified a specific requirement for LIM2 for binding to Warts. However, in vivo, both LIM1 and LIM2, but not LIM3, were required for regulation of wing growth, Yorkie activity, and Warts localization. Conversely, LIM2 and LIM3, but not LIM1, were required for regulation of cell shape and Steppke localization in vivo, and for maximal Steppke binding in co-immunoprecipitation experiments. These observations identify distinct functions for the different LIM domains of Jub.

The Drosophila wing imaginal disc is a tissue of undifferentiated cells that are precursors of the wing and most of the notum of the adult fly. The wing disc first forms during embryogenesis from a cluster of ∼30 cells located in the second thoracic segment, which invaginate to form a sac-like structure. They undergo extensive proliferation during larval stages to form a mature larval wing disc of ∼35,000 cells. During this time, distinct cell fates are assigned to different regions, and the wing disc develops a complex morphology. Finally, during pupal stages the wing disc undergoes morphogenetic processes and then differentiates to form the adult wing and notum. While the bulk of the wing disc comprises epithelial cells, it also includes neurons and glia, and is associated with tracheal cells and muscle precursor cells. The relative simplicity and accessibility of the wing disc, combined with the wealth of genetic tools available in Drosophila, have combined to make it a premier system for identifying genes and deciphering systems that play crucial roles in animal development. Studies in wing imaginal discs have made key contributions to many areas of biology, including tissue patterning, signal transduction, growth control, regeneration, planar cell polarity, morphogenesis, and tissue mechanics.

Hippo signaling mediates influences of cytoskeletal tension on organ growth. TRIP6 and LIMD1 have each been identified as being required for tension-dependent inhibition of the Hippo pathway LATS kinases and their recruitment to adherens junctions, but the relationship between TRIP6 and LIMD1 was unknown. Using siRNA-mediated gene knockdown, we show that TRIP6 is required for LIMD1 localization to adherens junctions, whereas LIMD1 is not required for TRIP6 localization. TRIP6, but not LIMD1, is also required for the recruitment of vinculin and VASP to adherens junctions. Knockdown of TRIP6 or vinculin, but not of LIMD1, also influences the localization of myosin and F-actin. In TRIP6 knockdown cells, actin stress fibers are lost apically but increased basally, and there is a corresponding increase in the recruitment of vinculin and VASP to basal focal adhesions. Our observations identify a role for TRIP6 in organizing F-actin and maintaining tension at adherens junctions that could account for its influence on LIMD1 and LATS. They also suggest that focal adhesions and adherens junctions compete for key proteins needed to maintain attachments to contractile F-actin.

The Hippo-Yes-associated protein (YAP) signaling network plays a central role as an integrator of signals that control cellular proliferation and differentiation. The past several years have provided an increasing appreciation and understanding of the diverse mechanisms through which metabolites and metabolic signals influence Hippo-YAP signaling, and how Hippo-YAP signaling, in turn, controls genes that direct cellular and organismal metabolism. These connections enable Hippo-YAP signaling to coordinate organ growth and homeostasis with nutrition and metabolism. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of some of the many interconnections between Hippo-YAP signaling and metabolism and how they are affected in disease conditions.